Fish Sniffer On Demand Digital Edition Issue 3911 May 2020 | Page 18
18
T
May 2020
VOL.39 • ISS. 11
California files legal
claims challenging
federal water plan
n a move backed by fishing, envi-
ronmental and tribal organizations,
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra,
the California Natural Resources Agency,
and the California Environmental Protec-
tion Agency on Earth Day filed a motion
for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit
challenging the Trump Administration’s
“unlawful expansion of federal water export
operations in the Central Valley.”
The filing argues that the diversion
of water in accordance with the Trump
Administration’s revised biological opinions
will cause ”imminent and irreparable harm
to species protected under the California
Endangered Species Act and the federal
Endangered Species Act,” according to
a statement from the Attorney General’s
Office.
“The Trump Administration is recklessly
endangering California’s ecosystem and
depleting irreplaceable natural resources,”
said Attorney General Becerra. “As we
speak, some of California’s most endangered
species are being pushed closer to extinction
– and there is no way to turn back the clock
once the damage is done. We are fighting to
prevent the Trump Administration’s blatant
disregard for science and the law before it
permanently alters California’s environ-
mental landscape.”
Attorney General Becerra, along with
state partners, filed a lawsuit on February
20, 2020, challenging the Trump Admin-
istration’s decision to adopt what Becerra
described as “scientifically deficient biolog-
ical opinions that enable additional water
exports from the San Joaquin Delta without
providing adequate safeguards for endan-
gered species.”
The lawsuit argues that the Trump
Administration’s actions “violate the state
and federal Endangered Species Acts, the
Administrative Procedure Act, and the
National Environmental Policy Act by
failing to protect endangered species and
their habitat in the Sacramento and San
Joaquin River watersheds, including the
San Joaquin Delta.”
In today’s filing, Attorney General
Becerra argues that a preliminary injunc-
tion is necessary to prevent “immediate
and irreversible harm” to California’s
ecosystem, particularly to California’s
endangered Delta smelt, longfin smelt,
and threatened steelhead trout.
The motion was filed as the Delta smelt,
once the most abundant fish species
on the Sacramento-San Joaquin River
Delta, continues its steep slide towards
extinction. For the second year in a row,
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife in its annual fall midwater trawl
survey in 2019 found zero Delta smelt
during the months of September, October,
November and December.
Found only in the San Francisco
Bay-Delta Estuary, the smelt is an
indicator species that shows the health
of the ecosystem. Decades of water
exports and environmental degradation
under the state and federal governments
have brought the smelt to the edge of
extinction.
Becerra asserts the Trump Adminis-
tration’s operation of water pumps in
the Delta under the biological opinions
violates the state and federal Endangered
Species Acts because it has resulted, and
will result, in the unlawful take of Delta
smelt, longfin smelt, threatened Central
Valley steelhead and other fish species.
Becerra also amended the original
complaint to include the claim that the
Trump Administration’s actions violate
the federal Endangered Species Act and
the California Endangered Species Act.
A copy of the motion and the amended
By Dan Bacher
complaint can be found here and here.
Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Brenda
Burman issued a statement strongly criticizing
the state of California and Attorney General
Becerra for filing a motion for a preliminary
injunction and other pleadings today regarding
the Central Valley Project.
“At no other time in modern history has
the State of California taken such ill-founded
actions to directly hurt more than 25 million
Californians by unnecessarily jeopardizing their
water supply. Now, more than ever, it is critical
that water be reliably delivered to Americans,
and we are taking actions to do that,” claimed
Burman.
On the other hand, salmon fishermen praised
the Governor and Attorney General for filing the
litigation.
“We appreciate the Governor and Attorney
General stepping up to protect California’s
natural resources, including salmon and related
jobs, from the Trump Bureau of Reclamation,”
said John McManus, President of the Golden
Gate Salmon Association. “The Trump team is
draining and killing the Delta and Central Valley
rivers right now, just when this year’s crop of
baby salmon are trying to make it out to sea so
we’re thankful for the state’s intervention to
stop this.”
“The governor and AG’s action to protect
California from another Trump administration
attack on our environment will not only aid
salmon and other wildlife, but also, ironically,
make more water available to everyone in
Southern California,” he said.
”This action by the governor is good for
California’s environment, for salmon fishing
jobs throughout California, and for the residents
and businesses in Southern California. Fair is
fair. The Trump Administration should obey
the same laws that apply to all Californians,”
McManus concluded.
According to Restore the Delta, the court
documents filed are (1() An amended complaint,
which adds claims that the Bureau of Reclama-
tion’s operations of the CVP violate the Endan-
gered Species Act and violate the California
Endangered Species Act and (2) a motion for a
preliminary injunction, asking the Court to limit
pumping next month to the levels required by
the 2008 and 2009 biological opinions, rather
than the higher pumping levels allowed
under the Trump biops.
“We are grateful to California Attorney
General Xavier Becerra for his continued
work to protect the San Francisco Bay-Delta
estuary from extreme pumping,” said
Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, Executive
Director, Restore the Delta. “Delta species
deserve protection -- and the health of Delta
people is tied to the proper management
and health of the estuary. What a great way
to honor the legacy of environmental law
enforcement since the first Earth Day, 50
years ago.”
Politico also reported: “In October 2017,
Bernhardt’s calendars show he had begun
directing a series of specific steps to rewrite
the underlying protections for the Delta
smelt, a 3-inch-long fish that lives only
in the Bay-Delta and which scientists say
is teetering on the brink of extinction in
large part because of water pumping. He
also directed a rewrite of protections for
winter-run Chinook salmon, which also
restrict water exports. Those changes are
aimed at cementing far looser species protec-
tions than the drought bill secured, and for
years going forward.”
While fishing and environmental groups
responded positively to the lawsuit against
the Trump Administration, it must be noted
that the Newsom Administration has been
promoting its own water plans that pose a
big threat to endangered smelt and salmon,
including the Delta Tunnel, agribusi-
ness-sponsored voluntary water agreements,
an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that
increases water exports for the state and
federal projects rather than reducing them,
and a controversial water portfolio that
includes fast tracking the Sites Reservoir.
It is not surprising that Governor Newsom
received a total of $755,198 in donations
from agribusiness interests that will benefit
from these plans, based on the latest data
from www.followthemoney.org. That figure
includes $116,800 from Beverly Hills
agribusiness tycoons Stewart and Lynda
Resnick, the largest orchard fruit growers in
the world and the sponsors of the Coalition
for a Sustainable Delta.
Feinstein urges Newsom to negotiate with feds
over increasing water exports to agribusiness
O
n April 15, U.S. Senator Dianne
Feinstein and Representatives
Jim Costa, TJ Cox, John Garamendi, and
Josh Harder sent a letter to Governor
Gavin Newsom imploring him to reach an
agreement with federal agencies through
negotiation, rather than judicial action, on
increasing water deliveries from the Delta to
San Joaquin Valley corporate agribusiness
interests.
A coalition of fishing groups, Tribes, envi-
ronmental organizations, family farmers and
elected officials opposing the reaching of this
agreement between the state’s flawed inci-
dental take permit and the federal govern-
ment’s even more flawed federal biological
opinion because maximized water deliveries
to agribusiness will drive imperiled salmon,
Delta smelt and other species even closer to
extinction.
In the letter to Governor Newsom, the
members wrote: “We believe the most
plausible path forward is through continued
negotiation and the voluntary agreement
process. We understand that an agreement
between the necessary parties was close but
has not yet been reached. Early implemen-
tation of such a voluntary agreement when
fully negotiated could provide a framework
to allow the State to settle its lawsuit with the
federal government and resolve the differ-
LOCATED JUST
3905
ences between the federal biological opinions
and the State’s incidental take permit for the
long-term operation of the State Water Project.”
Read the full letter here.
In a separate letter to Interior Secretary David
Bernhardt, a former lobbyist for the Westlands
Water District and the oil industry, the members
wrote: “Continued coordinated operation is
threatened by the conflict between the federal
biological opinions and the state’s recently
issued incidental take permit for the long-term
operation of the State Water Project. Given the
seriousness of this challenge, we urge you to
take advantage of what is likely the last oppor-
tunity to work with the state and seek a solution
to this impasse.” Read the full letter here.
Daniel Errotabere, Westlands Water District
Board President, lauded Senator Feinstein and
Representatives Costa, Cox, Garamendi, and
Josh Harder for sending the letter to Governor
Newsom.
“The letter sent today to Governor Newsom
by Senator Feinstein and her colleagues in the
House of Representatives strikes exactly the
right note. Continued conflict and litigation
between the State of California and the federal
government related to the efficacy of the
recently issued biological opinions will harm
not only water supplies for farms, rural commu-
nities, and urban areas in every region of the
CONTINUED ON PG 19